
Martin Hořický
With the growing number of attacks on web and mobile applications, the risk of exploiting vulnerabilities in code or configuration is also increasing. Security flaws often go undetected by traditional functional testing, as they may not occur as visible errors during application behavior.
Security analysis therefore involves specialized techniques that help identify weaknesses before they can be exploited. Among the most widely used methods are Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).
Unlike dynamic testing, static analysis is performed without running the application – directly on its source code:
From a security perspective, it is a key preventive tool – early detection of weaknesses reduces remediation costs and improves overall application quality.
In contrast to static analysis, dynamic analysis is carried out on a running application and monitors its behavior in real time:
From a security standpoint, it reveals weaknesses that emerge during runtime and may be missed by static checks. It is therefore a critical part of a comprehensive application testing strategy.
| Benefit | Description |
|---|---|
| Enhanced application security | Vulnerabilities are identified before they can be exploited. |
| Efficiency and cost savings | Early detection significantly reduces remediation costs. |
| Developer feedback | Supports faster and more secure software development. |
| Compliance with legal and security requirements | Meets the standards and regulations such as DORA, NIS2. |
| Reduced risk of successful cyberattacks | Combining static and dynamic analysis significantly limits the attack surface. |
Testing must be part of a comprehensive ICT risk management framework that includes prevention, detection, response, and recovery from cyber incidents.
Organizations must regularly assess the security of applications and systems, ensuring the integrity, availability, and confidentiality of data.
The identification and management of vulnerabilities in systems, software components, and libraries must be continuous and well-documented.
The tools and methodologies used must be appropriate to the scale and complexity of the systems in operation.
Determining the codebase, components, libraries, and coverage of the analysis.
Running specialized tools directly on the source code without executing the application.
Sorting, validating, and eliminating false positives.
Providing remediation guidance and feedback for developers.
Defining the target application and test environments.
Conducting real-time interaction tests to evaluate the application’s response to simulated threats.
Detecting issues such as XSS, SQL injection, unauthorized access, or weak API protection.
Analyzing findings, suggesting remediations, and documenting results for development and management teams.
BDO provides application security testing services (SAST and DAST) in line with the specific requirements of European regulators (e.g. ECB, EBA, ESMA) and frameworks such as DORA, NIS2, and ISO/IEC 27001. Our methodology combines static and dynamic analysis, knowledge of the regulatory framework, and deep technical know-how—including scenarios reflecting sector threats and digital attacks in the European financial space.
01 Independence and credibility
As an independent consulting firm, we do not own any technologies and offer truly objective assessments. Cooperation with BDO is a clear signal of quality and trust for both regulators and clients.
02 Certified team with expert experience
Our specialists hold certifications such as OSCP, CRTP, eCPPT, BSCP, CEH, CRT, CPSA, CISSP, CCISO, and others. They have experience testing large banks, insurers, and ICT providers.